Adding variant subtag 'erzgeb' for Erzgebirgisch
CE Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Wed Aug 12 17:48:36 CEST 2009
I'm sending this again as it did not go through:
Hi.
Obviously however [vmf] and [sxu] both are Germanic languages, so a prefix of [gem] would not be inaccurate; it would just not be that specific; it would not be fictitious
{oops; I meant 'specific'}
and it would be fine to use it were there no other prefix available. However I must defer to you; it would not be that useful in matching. On the other hand, a prefix of [de] is specific; using it as a prefix lets users retrieve documents in German when documents in the target language/dialect (Erzgebirgisch) are not available, as I understand things. This may be linguistically inaccurate, but it is expedient. Correct me if I am wrong.
In any case we no longer have to wait on new subtags; we now have two new subtags to choose from; I know nothing about the language and nothing about German; from the evidence I saw at Wikipedia and Ethnologue I think I'd favor [sxu] but maybe that is an inaccurate prefix; I would prefer that the German linguists and speakers hammer this one out.
Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
Wed Aug 12 04:58:09 CEST 2009
> CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>> . . .
> . . .
>> And, if there are two variants of Erzgebirgisch, then I do not see why
>> we would object to having both of the other two prefixes.
> I haven't seen a scrap of evidence that anyone thinks there are two
> variants of Erzgebirgisch. Randy made a comment that *if there were*
> two such variants, then it would be appropriate to have two tags, but he
> added specifically that he was NOT saying this was so. Certainly I've
> never heard Thomas make such a claim.
I believe I said "if." Sorry if it did not come out sounding that way. Best, C. E. Whiteheadcewcathar at hotmail.com
>> However, if Thomas Goldammer has only one variant he wants a subtag
>> registered for, and if he can decide which prefix it should have, then
>> . . . I am fine with this single prefix.
> I think that is a wise decision.
> --
> Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20090812/bab88d50/attachment.htm
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list