[RTW] [dispatch] Does RTC-WEB need to pick a signaling protocol?

[Rosenberg, Jonathan]

Absolutely. I agree this debate should be resolved in the group, and the
charter should specify that this question (whether or not we need to
specify a protocol, and then if so, what it is) is in scope. I send some
proposed text for charter wording along these lines.

Of course, that doesn't mean we cannot start the debate early. And indeed,
since we have, I chimed in ;)

-Jonathan R.

Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.               SkypeID: jdrosen
Chief Technology Strategist                Mobile: +1 (732) 766-2496
Skype                                      SkypeIn: +1 (408) 465-0361
jdrosen at skype.net                          http://www.skype.com
jdrosen at jdrosen.net                        http://www.jdrosen.net


-----Original Message-----
From: rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no]
On Behalf Of Adam Roach
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Jonathan Rosenberg
Cc: rtc-web at alvestrand.no; 'DISPATCH list'
Subject: Re: [RTW] [dispatch] Does RTC-WEB need to pick a signaling
protocol?

On 1/29/11 8:35 AM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> I'm starting a separate thread on this, since I don't want to confound
> it with the charter discussion. This is a topic that should be
> resolved within the group itself

I have a number of thoughts on this topic also, but I don't think this
(DISPATCH) is the forum for them. I'd like for these conversations to
take place, though, so I want it to be clear in the charter that we
aren't precluded from choosing one path over the other.

Is it fair to characterize your statement that "this is a topic that
should be resolved within the group itself" to support leaving the
charter open enough to support any consensus conclusion that discussion
may reach?

/a
_______________________________________________
RTC-Web mailing list
RTC-Web at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web