IESG restructuring (Re: Example of the One Liners out of context)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand harald at alvestrand.no
Mon May 26 22:44:25 CEST 2003


what do other people think here?

--On søndag, mai 25, 2003 07:25:22 -0700 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> i do not think that adding a process director to the iesg is
> constructive, and would be in fact destructive.  we don't need to
> politicize the wgs, iesg, secretariat as we already have this wg.
> we should leave some parts of the organization to do actual ietf
> work.
>
> and all this seems like so much red herring, without even sour
> cream, but plenty of confrontationalism, polarization, etc.  no
> real substance, all politics, at which we engnineers are so expert
> (not).  so we destroy our organization and our culture with it.
> omplalo-sepsis.
>
> dunno about you, but i spent years in the iso, ieee, ansi, ...  i
> came here to get engineering work done, not play amateur power
> politics, voting blocks, ....  the focus on real work has been the
> ietf's strength and the root of its success.  i suggest we play to
> our strengths, not divisiveness, mud-slinging, and demagoguery.
>
> randy
>
>




More information about the Problem-statement mailing list