IESG restructuring (Re: Example of the One Liners out of context)
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Mon May 26 22:44:25 CEST 2003
what do other people think here?
--On søndag, mai 25, 2003 07:25:22 -0700 Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> i do not think that adding a process director to the iesg is
> constructive, and would be in fact destructive. we don't need to
> politicize the wgs, iesg, secretariat as we already have this wg.
> we should leave some parts of the organization to do actual ietf
> work.
>
> and all this seems like so much red herring, without even sour
> cream, but plenty of confrontationalism, polarization, etc. no
> real substance, all politics, at which we engnineers are so expert
> (not). so we destroy our organization and our culture with it.
> omplalo-sepsis.
>
> dunno about you, but i spent years in the iso, ieee, ansi, ... i
> came here to get engineering work done, not play amateur power
> politics, voting blocks, .... the focus on real work has been the
> ietf's strength and the root of its success. i suggest we play to
> our strengths, not divisiveness, mud-slinging, and demagoguery.
>
> randy
>
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list