Time required to write down "wisdom" (Re: "Adult supervision")

[Keith Moore]

> I am not advocating pushing documents forward without adequate
> review, but much more for having pro-active editors, WG chairs
> and sheparding ADs to make sure the documents are getting done
> in a timely fashion, especially ones identified as important.
> This is more about breakdown in management, in my opinion.

It's one thing to require this of WG documents.  It's somewhat harder to
imagine how to apply it to individual submissions.

And in general, having people be more pro-active means giving them more time
to work on things, which might be beyond our control.