WG / documentation question

[avri]

Hi,

Actually a few of the editors and members of the editorial team
have been participating, they just have been doing so without saying
they are editors.

As far as the documents go, as I mentioned earlier in the week,
they should be coming out in a few days.

I personally apologize for doing more listening then talking on
this list, but as of now I don't have much to say that someone
else hasn't already contributed.  I have also been focused on
annoying the editors of the two docs.   I think much of the
editorial team has been trying to absorb the concerns of
the folks on the list, but as I said several have been active
all along.  I expect that once the IDs are submitted
in the next days, there will be even more active conversation
on this list.


a.

john.loughney at nokia.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> While the discussions on this list seems to be at least mildly interesting, I
> am a bit worried by the lack of public comment by the WG Chairs & Document editors.
> I would like to see proactive comments by the chairs / editors on the milestones and
> progress of the document. A list of open issues would not be a bad thing.
> 
> There is no requirement, I believe, that the chairs & editors be passive listeners.
> Actually, many people have pointed out that more active management by WG chairs
> and a more open process reporting by chairs & document editors would be a good
> thing for the IETF, so I would hope that this working group would talk the lead 
> in these matters.
> 
> thanks,
> John
> 
>