suggested iesg minutes rule of thumb
Bound, Jim
Jim.Bound at hp.com
Thu May 8 01:46:57 CEST 2003
ACK 100%.
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 12:10 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu; Jonne.Soininen at nokia.com;
> problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: suggested iesg minutes rule of thumb
>
>
> > > I don't buy it. The community is better served if certain
> > > issues which sometimes need to be discussed by IESG, are not
> > > aired in public. We expect the nomcom to keep its
> > > deliberations private for similar reasons.
> >
> > Producing minutes for example why the IESG is not supporting a WGs
> > spec technically is prudent and not like nomcom or private IETF
> > management or organizational discussions which should not be public
> > unless it involves a financial official issue.
>
> suggested rule of thumb:
>
> technical discussions go in minutes
> personnel discussions are not made public
>
> Keith
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list