suggested iesg minutes rule of thumb

Bound, Jim Jim.Bound at hp.com
Thu May 8 01:46:57 CEST 2003


ACK 100%.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 12:10 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu; Jonne.Soininen at nokia.com; 
> problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: suggested iesg minutes rule of thumb
> 
> 
> > > I don't buy it.  The community is better served if certain
> > > issues which sometimes need to be discussed by IESG, are not 
> > > aired in public.  We expect the nomcom to keep its 
> > > deliberations private for similar reasons.
> > 
> > Producing minutes for example why the IESG is not supporting a WGs 
> > spec technically is prudent and not like nomcom or private IETF 
> > management or organizational discussions which should not be public 
> > unless it involves a financial official issue.
> 
> suggested rule of thumb:  
> 
> technical discussions go in minutes
> personnel discussions are not made public
> 
> Keith
> 


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list