The "late surprise" problem

[Spencer Dawkins]

Ted and Brian are both right - this is a good thing to do,
but not because it prevents late surprises, and we need to make
sure we don't replace the "IESG is the only sane people at IETF"
issue with "IESG + SIR are the only sane people at IETF".

Spencer

--- Ted Hardie <hardie at qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> This may solve a problem, but I don't think it quite addresses
> the same problem I've tried to address.  It creates a review
> body that would no doubt be of enormous help to the IESG,
> which might speed things along.  It is, however, still very
> late in the process.  Fundamentally, it is after the working
> group process finishes.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com