General comment on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt

[Margaret Wasserman]

Yeah, but it is a really cool solution!

It often seems negative and non-constructive to constrain
ourselves to discussing problems.  At least we'll soon get
to start talking about the processes we'll use to determine
solutions...  That should be more positive, I hope.

Margaret


At 01:06 PM 3/3/2003 -0600, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
>... and I do need to apologize for spinning us lightly
>through a solution on the problem-statement mailing list
>(it just slipped out!)
>
>Spencer
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:03 PM
> > To: Margaret Wasserman
> > Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu; Spencer Dawkins; problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> > Subject: Re: General comment on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt
> >
> >
>
>[deleted, down to ]
> >
> > ...  For instance, having each area provide a set of
> > shepherds to advise working groups seems like a good idea, but I'm not
> > sure how much it will help with cross-area conflicts.
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >