"trouble maker"

Keith Moore moore at cs.utk.edu
Sun Jun 22 19:35:04 CEST 2003

> For wordings, I proposed to add a sub section to 2.6, as follows:
> 2.6.1 Vocal individual have ability to stall the rough consensus 
> building process
> In some working groups, a vocal individual could stall the working group 
> progress for many months or indefinately by repeatively re-opening 
> closed issues. This, coupled with the threat with appeal on technical 
> and process ground, effectively prevented the working group chair to 
> declare a rough consensus on the group.

but it *doesn't* prevent a WG chair from declaring rough consensus.

More information about the Problem-statement mailing list