"trouble maker"
Keith Moore
moore at cs.utk.edu
Sun Jun 22 19:35:04 CEST 2003
> For wordings, I proposed to add a sub section to 2.6, as follows:
>
> 2.6.1 Vocal individual have ability to stall the rough consensus
> building process
>
> In some working groups, a vocal individual could stall the working group
> progress for many months or indefinately by repeatively re-opening
> closed issues. This, coupled with the threat with appeal on technical
> and process ground, effectively prevented the working group chair to
> declare a rough consensus on the group.
but it *doesn't* prevent a WG chair from declaring rough consensus.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list