"trouble maker"

[James Seng]

It shouldnt. But it does.

-James Seng

Keith Moore wrote:
>>For wordings, I proposed to add a sub section to 2.6, as follows:
>>
>>2.6.1 Vocal individual have ability to stall the rough consensus 
>>building process
>>
>>In some working groups, a vocal individual could stall the working group 
>>progress for many months or indefinately by repeatively re-opening 
>>closed issues. This, coupled with the threat with appeal on technical 
>>and process ground, effectively prevented the working group chair to 
>>declare a rough consensus on the group.
> 
> 
> but it *doesn't* prevent a WG chair from declaring rough consensus.
> 
>