Minor comments on draft-ietf-problem-statement-00.txt

[RJ Atkinson]

On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 11:53 America/Montreal, Margaret Wasserman 
wrote:
> In the past, I have heard people object to statements such as
> "the IETF is an SDO", on the grounds that the IETF also does
> other things (research, publication of non-standard documents,
> operational advice, etc.).
>
> If everyone agrees that the IETF is an SDO, we could remove
> the wording that indicates otherwise.
>
> Margaret

If that is done, I would strongly prefer wording that does not LIMIT
IETF to only being an SDO.  There are other things that get done
besides standards-development and we don't want to exclude those,
IMHO.

Ran