last call results - process document

[Keith Moore]

> My recollection matches Melinda's.  There was very strong
> consensus in the room (I think we were in Vienna) on the
> short-term recommendations in the process document, and 
> this was confirmed on the mailing list.

sigh.  I guess I think that by Vienna this WG had long since lost its credibility due to the way that the problem statement document was handled, and for that reason that any consensus of those remaining is of dubious value.  

However, I don't personally have objections to the items listed in 5.1, with the possible exception of #7, and only because I think the way #7 is stated it would only encourage us to move the underlying problem rather than solving it.

I'd have much less objection if this WG were to publish section 5.1 and supporting material only, and completely omit the longer-term recommendations from the document.