last call results - process document

[Margaret.Wasserman at nokia.com]

My recollection matches Melinda's.  There was very strong
consensus in the room (I think we were in Vienna) on the
short-term recommendations in the process document, and 
this was confirmed on the mailing list.

The WG opinion was split on the longer-term recommendations
that were in the document at that time, and I don't recall
that we have achieved WG consensus on any other longer-term
solutions.

Margaret


> -----Original Message-----
> From: problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no]On Behalf Of 
> ext Melinda
> Shore
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: Keith Moore
> Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: last call results - process document
> 
> 
> On Monday, December 15, 2003, at 08:10 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> > no, I don't think so.  basically I don't think this document was
> > ever taken seriously by much of the working group, so any purported
> > consensus on any of the document is dubious at best.
> 
> There was near unanimity in support of the suggestions for
> short-term improvement identified in the document - about as
> close as I've seen to perfect consensus in an IETF working
> group.  There's no consensus on the longer-term suggestions,
> nor will there be (at least not in this working group) and
> we're trying to come to consensus on the document itself.
> That's more-or-less what we're trying to capture in the text
> in question.
> 
> Melinda
> 
>