Last call results - process document

graham.travers at bt.com graham.travers at bt.com
Thu Dec 11 16:00:17 CET 2003


Melinda,

I suggest you say that, then.  8o)  It didn't read that way to me, although I understood that to be the case from following the discussions.  

If you leave the original text, I think you need the double negative, to be clear.  The original text suggests that there WAS consensus, but for some reason the document doesn't record it !

	Regards,

	Graham Travers

	International Standards Manager
	BT Exact

	e-mail:   graham.travers at bt.com
	tel:      +44(0) 1359 235086
	mobile:   +44(0) 7808 502536
	fax:      +44(0) 1359 235087

	HWB279, PO Box 200,London, N18 1ZF, UK

	BTexact Technologies is a trademark of British Telecommunications plc
	Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
	Registered in England no. 1800000

	This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above) immediately.
	      


	      



-----Original Message-----
From: problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no]On Behalf Of Melinda
Shore
Sent: 11 December 2003 14:55
To: Travers,G,Graham,XVT TRAVERG R
Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: Last call results - process document


On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 09:39 AM, <graham.travers at bt.com> 
wrote:
> ".... it does not represent a set of steps for longer-term 
> improvements for which there was Working Group consensus."
> Do you mean " ... for which there was NO Working Group consensus."  ?

The curse of the double negative.  What we were attempting to say is 
that
there was no consensus on any of the recommendations for longer-term
improvements.

Melinda



More information about the Problem-statement mailing list