Last call results - process document

[Melinda Shore]

On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 09:39 AM, <graham.travers at bt.com> 
wrote:
> ".... it does not represent a set of steps for longer-term 
> improvements for which there was Working Group consensus."
> Do you mean " ... for which there was NO Working Group consensus."  ?

The curse of the double negative.  What we were attempting to say is 
that
there was no consensus on any of the recommendations for longer-term
improvements.

Melinda