Last call results - process document
graham.travers at bt.com
graham.travers at bt.com
Thu Dec 11 15:39:11 CET 2003
Melinda,
".... it does not represent a set of steps for longer-term improvements for which there was Working Group consensus."
Do you mean " ... for which there was NO Working Group consensus." ?
Regards,
Graham Travers
International Standards Manager
BT Exact
e-mail: graham.travers at bt.com
tel: +44(0) 1359 235086
mobile: +44(0) 7808 502536
fax: +44(0) 1359 235087
HWB279, PO Box 200,London, N18 1ZF, UK
BTexact Technologies is a trademark of British Telecommunications plc
Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
Registered in England no. 1800000
This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above) immediately.
-----Original Message-----
From: problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:problem-statement-bounces at alvestrand.no]On Behalf Of Melinda
Shore
Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28
To: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
Subject: Last call results - process document
The last call for IETF Problem Resolution Process,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-problem-process-03.txt ,
has ended. The comments were primarily on the question of
whether or not to release the document. There is consensus
that if it is to be published, the longer-term process
changes material would be as a record of the working group's
deliberations and *not* as a set of recommendations to be
acted upon. There were few comments on the contents of the
document and those focused on improving the set of
recommendations, which given the change in focus of the
document are now more appropriate to the Solutions
discussions.
We'd like to propose adding the following text to the
abstract and introduction:
This Informational memo is being released to record
the history of discussions by the Problem WG in
2003. While there was working group consensus on
the portions of the document describing processes
for short-term and medium term improvements, it
does not represent a set of steps for longer-term
improvements for which there was Working Group
consensus.
Is there anybody who cannot live with adding this text and
sending the document on?
Avri and Melinda
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list