My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
john.loughney at nokia.com
john.loughney at nokia.com
Thu Apr 17 23:22:01 CEST 2003
Hi James,
> There seems to be a common misconception in IETF that people can't
> appeal a WG or IESG decision based on technical grounds. RFC 2026 is
> quite clear that this is possible. Section 6.5.2 has this to say about
> appeals:
>
> An individual (whether a participant in the relevant Working Group or
> not) may disagree with a Working Group recommendation based on his or
> her belief that either (a) his or her own views have not been
> adequately considered by the Working Group, or (b) the Working Group
> has made an incorrect technical choice which places the quality
> and/or integrity of the Working Group's product(s) in significant
> jeopardy. The first issue is a difficulty with Working Group
> process; the latter is an assertion of technical error. These two
> types of disagreement are quite different, but both are handled by
> the same process of review.
>
> The RFC then goes on to describe the appeal process.
But what happens when an AD or IESG member tells a document editor
to change x, y & z before a draft can pass IESG review? Is there
any way to appeal this? This is what I think most people have
been complaining about.
I am not trying to be inflamatory, but generally curious - can
the WG or document editor pose a challenge to the IESG in such
a circumstance? Is there an official appeals process?
br,
John
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list