Registration of media type FO and ZFO

Mark Baker distobj at acm.org
Mon Jun 9 19:44:29 CEST 2008


On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Jakub Hytka <hytka at 602.cz> wrote:
>  Type name: application
>
>  Subtype name: Vendor Tree - vnd.software602.filler.xml+form
>
>  Required parameters: None
>
>  Optional parameters: None
>
>  Encoding considerations: UTF-8
>
>  Security considerations: FO is a XML-based plain text format, secured by
> signing the file itself through the means of the XML Signature standard.

So the file is digitally signed, but in what form?  That you say UTF-8
suggests it's some sort of text based form, no?

The "+" convention also isn't necessarily intended to be reused
outside of the context of XML, so "xml+form" won't mean anything to
anybody.  You could save a few characters and just use "form".

>  Type name: application
>
>  Subtype name: Vendor Tree - vnd.software602.filler.xml+zip+form
>
>  Required parameters: None
>
>  Optional parameters: None
>
>  Encoding considerations: UTF-8
>
>  Security considerations: ZFO is a XML-based plain text format packed using
> the ZIP archive algorithms. The XML content is secured by signing the file
> itself through the means of the XML Signature standard. The ZIP file itself
> can be protected in the usual way by setting up a password.

Similar comments apply here: the inclusion of "xml" and "zip" add no
value AFAICT.

This one seems quite clearly a binary format though.  You can just say
there's no encoding considerations.

Mark.


More information about the Ietf-types mailing list