Record and registration form for 'unifon'

[Michael Everson]

On 23 Sep 2013, at 14:58, Gordon P. Hemsley <gphemsley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe others disagree, but it doesn't seem right to me to introduce a subtag for a script that is not yet in Unicode. Is there precedent for that?

Firstly, that isn't the case. Secondly, Unicode may never encode things which are scripts whether or not Unicode encodes them. Thirdly, script subtags are encoded in ISO 15924.

> These images demonstrate the alphabet, including a number of characters unique to Unifon (i.e. not just traditional Latin script):

Yes. So what? They are extensions to Latin just as ð and ŋ are. 

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/