Proposed general model for Serbo-Croatian continuum
Mark Davis ☕
mark at macchiato.com
Wed Nov 27 12:37:02 CET 2013
I'm with Doug on this. They are purely redundant.
And what are we afraid of, that people would use sr-Arab-ekavsk? Or that
they somehow would think that sr-Latn-ekavsk was not legal?
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:27 AM, John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Phillips, Addison scripsit:
> > Don't like what? That script subtags can be used with a variant? It's
> > easy to find use cases: for example, selecting a TTS engine for a
> > written bit of content.
> No no. What Doug doesn't like is the idea of explicitly specifying
> 'sr-Latn' and 'sr-Cyrl' as prefixes along with 'sr'. He says it's
> redundant, which is true: I just think the redundancy helps clarity in
> this case.
> John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
> The present impossibility of giving a scientific explanation is no proof
> that there is no scientific explanation. The unexplained is not to be
> identified with the unexplainable, and the strange and extraordinary
> nature of a fact is not a justification for attributing it to powers
> above nature. --The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "telepathy" (1913)
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages