Proposed general model for Serbo-Croatian continuum

Doug Ewell doug at
Wed Nov 27 15:33:27 CET 2013

Mark Davis 🍗 wrote:

> Or that they somehow would think that sr-Latn-ekavsk was not legal?

Yes, apparently that was the concern. I suppose we could have added 
"sr-RS" and "sr-ME" (with and without script subtags, six total), so 
users who do not read the standard would know those too were legal with 
the variants.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | @DougEwell ­

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list