Proposed general model for Serbo-Croatian continuum
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Wed Nov 27 15:33:27 CET 2013
Mark Davis 🍗 wrote:
> Or that they somehow would think that sr-Latn-ekavsk was not legal?
Yes, apparently that was the concern. I suppose we could have added
"sr-RS" and "sr-ME" (with and without script subtags, six total), so
users who do not read the standard would know those too were legal with
the variants.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list