Last call: Latvian (and Bontok) extlang subtags
kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se
Mon Feb 8 09:26:15 CET 2010
Further, note that the *majority* of language codes that that are
encompassed by macrolanguage codes do NOT have any extlang subtag
in the LSR.
Den 2010-02-08 07.39, skrev "John Cowan" <cowan at ccil.org>:
> Michael Everson scripsit:
>> Oh, I really don't think we should discriminate in that way. Latvians
>> important, Bontocs not. No, no.
> No, no. "lv" a widely used tag, "bnc" not. Not the same thing at all.
> These two-part tags exist only for the sake of backward compatibility
> with what's already in use, and "bnc" is not (to speak of) in use.
More information about the Ietf-languages