Last call: Latvian (and Bontok) extlang subtags

Michael Everson everson at
Mon Feb 8 10:08:13 CET 2010

On 8 Feb 2010, at 06:39, John Cowan wrote:

> Michael Everson scripsit:
>> Oh, I really don't think we should discriminate in that way.  
>> Latvians  important, Bontocs not. No, no.
> No, no.  "lv" a widely used tag, "bnc" not.

How is the Reviewer to "know" this? How do you know it?

> Not the same thing at all. These two-part tags exist only for the  
> sake of backward compatibility with what's already in use, and "bnc"  
> is not (to speak of) in use.

Go on....

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list