Last call: Latvian (and Bontok) extlang subtags

[Michael Everson]

On 8 Feb 2010, at 06:39, John Cowan wrote:

> Michael Everson scripsit:
>
>> Oh, I really don't think we should discriminate in that way.  
>> Latvians  important, Bontocs not. No, no.
>
> No, no.  "lv" a widely used tag, "bnc" not.

How is the Reviewer to "know" this? How do you know it?

> Not the same thing at all. These two-part tags exist only for the  
> sake of backward compatibility with what's already in use, and "bnc"  
> is not (to speak of) in use.

Go on....

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/