Last call: Latvian (and Bontok) extlang subtags
everson at evertype.com
Mon Feb 8 10:08:13 CET 2010
On 8 Feb 2010, at 06:39, John Cowan wrote:
> Michael Everson scripsit:
>> Oh, I really don't think we should discriminate in that way.
>> Latvians important, Bontocs not. No, no.
> No, no. "lv" a widely used tag, "bnc" not.
How is the Reviewer to "know" this? How do you know it?
> Not the same thing at all. These two-part tags exist only for the
> sake of backward compatibility with what's already in use, and "bnc"
> is not (to speak of) in use.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Ietf-languages