New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for ISO 15924-based updates)
doug at ewellic.org
Sat Mar 21 20:13:20 CET 2009
Phillips, Addison <addison at amazon dot com> wrote:
>>> FWIW, note that the 4646bis draft does allow the original requester
>>> to modify the request without restarting the clock (there is still a
>>> minimum one week time period before an updated record can be
>>> approved; review periods are still in two week segments). We are not
>>> under 4646bis now, of course.
>> That, it seems, allows for more timely registrations.
> It's why LTRU made the change.
Still in all, I'm puzzled why there is so much urgency to approve this
particular subtag, the one we considered so useless that we are adding a
comment to the Registry to say how useless it is, the first time we have
ever done that.
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages