New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for ISO 15924-based updates)

Phillips, Addison addison at
Sat Mar 21 20:44:11 CET 2009

> >>> FWIW, note that the 4646bis draft does allow the original
> requester
> >>> to modify the request without restarting the clock (there is
> still a
> >>> minimum one week time period before an updated record can be
> >>> approved; review periods are still in two week segments). We
> are not
> >>> under 4646bis now, of course.
> >>
> >> That, it seems, allows for more timely registrations.
> >
> > It's why LTRU made the change.
> Still in all, I'm puzzled why there is so much urgency to approve
> this
> particular subtag, the one we considered so useless that we are
> adding a
> comment to the Registry to say how useless it is, the first time we
> have
> ever done that.


It's desperately urgent because it is needed as part of the new Ultimate-Useless-Valid tag:


(that's Klingon, as written in the "inherited" script, as used in Antarctica, as transcribed using the Uralic phonetic alphabet).


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list