Anomaly in upcoming registry
CE Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 9 00:30:28 CEST 2009
Hi, I'm sorry; I read these threads in a rush and thought I'd noted enough to write back. Also I skimmed through draft 10 of 4645
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10)
and I thought for sure [hbs] was there but I looked again and did not see it.
I don't right now have an opinion as to what to do with text that is meant to target speakers of two or more of the individual languages (Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian)--that is I cannot decide whether it is best to let this text be tagged with the deprecated [sh] subtag or with a 'revived' [sh] subtag; I suppose that [hbs] then will never be an option; my goof).
Best,
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
> CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>> in this case I actually don't object to 'un-deprecating' the code
>> element [sh] except that since we do have a three-letter code element
>> for the same macrolanguage, and since we do have both two-letter and
>> three-letter macrolanguage codes, it's almost unecessary labor to
>> 'un-deprecate' it.
> Well, when you do find 'hbs' in the Registry or in the drafts, be sure
> to let us know.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20090708/5332b308/attachment.htm
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list