Anomaly in upcoming registry

Doug Ewell doug at
Tue Jul 7 07:45:45 CEST 2009

CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:

> in this case I actually don't object to 'un-deprecating' the code 
> element [sh] except that since we do have a three-letter code element 
> for the same macrolanguage, and since we do have both two-letter and 
> three-letter macrolanguage codes, it's almost unecessary labor to 
> 'un-deprecate' it.

Well, when you do find 'hbs' in the Registry or in the drafts, be sure 
to let us know.

Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14  ˆ 

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list