Anomaly in upcoming registry
doug at ewellic.org
Tue Jul 7 07:45:45 CEST 2009
CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
> in this case I actually don't object to 'un-deprecating' the code
> element [sh] except that since we do have a three-letter code element
> for the same macrolanguage, and since we do have both two-letter and
> three-letter macrolanguage codes, it's almost unecessary labor to
> 'un-deprecate' it.
Well, when you do find 'hbs' in the Registry or in the drafts, be sure
to let us know.
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages