<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR>Hi, I'm sorry; I read these threads in a rush and thought I'd noted enough to write back. Also I skimmed through draft 10 of 4645 <BR>
(<A href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10</A>)<BR>
and I thought for sure [hbs] was there but I looked again and did not see it.<BR>
<BR>
I don't right now have an opinion as to what to do with text that is meant to target speakers of two or more of the individual languages (Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian)--that is I cannot decide whether it is best to let this text be tagged with the deprecated [sh] subtag or with a 'revived' [sh] subtag; I suppose that [hbs] then will never be an option; my goof).<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Best,<BR>
<BR>
C. E. Whitehead<BR>
<A href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</A> <BR>
<BR> <BR>
<H1> </H1>Doug Ewell <A title="Anomaly in upcoming registry" href="mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no?Subject=Anomaly in upcoming registry&In-Reply-To=">doug at ewellic.org </A><BR><PRE>> CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>> in this case I actually don't object to 'un-deprecating' the code
>> element [sh] except that since we do have a three-letter code element
>> for the same macrolanguage, and since we do have both two-letter and
>> three-letter macrolanguage codes, it's almost unecessary labor to
>> 'un-deprecate' it.
> Well, when you do find 'hbs' in the Registry or in the drafts, be sure
> to let us know.</PRE><PRE> </PRE></body>
</html>