Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU
mark at macchiato.com
Sat Feb 21 23:05:19 CET 2009
I agree with John and Doug.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 13:13, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
> Doug Ewell scripsit:
> > As part of the production of a replacement Registry in draft-4645bis, it
> > has been proposed to remove the Preferred-Value from "YU" -- as an LTRU
> > change -- and optionally replace it with a Comments field such as
> > "Comments: see BA, HR, ME, MK, RS, or SI".
> IMHO we should have LTRU go ahead and do this. When a new Registry is
> installed, it should be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. There is
> no point in deferring this one change -- after all, in principle almost
> *all* the new registry changes allowed by 4646bis could be deferred to
> this list, but what's the point?
> Furthermore, despite the technical distinction between LTRU and
> ietf-languages, the person involved is the same, our very own Official
> Do what you will, John Cowan
> this Life's a Fiction cowan at ccil.org
> And is made up of http://www.ccil.org/~cowan<http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
> Contradiction. --William Blake
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages