Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU

[Kent Karlsson]

I agree as well. Note that that means *no change* compared to 4645bis draft
9 in the record for YU.

    /kent k

Den 2009-02-21 23.05, skrev "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>:

> I agree with John and Doug.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 13:13, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
>> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>> 
>>> > As part of the production of a replacement Registry in draft-4645bis, it
>>> > has been proposed to remove the Preferred-Value from "YU" -- as an LTRU
>>> > change -- and optionally replace it with a Comments field such as
>>> > "Comments: see BA, HR, ME, MK, RS, or SI".
>> 
>> IMHO we should have LTRU go ahead and do this.  When a new Registry is
>> installed, it should be as accurate and up-to-date as possible.  There is
>> no point in deferring this one change -- after all, in principle almost
>> *all* the new registry changes allowed by 4646bis could be deferred to
>> this list, but what's the point?
>> 
>> Furthermore, despite the technical distinction between LTRU and
>> ietf-languages, the person involved is the same, our very own Official
>> Doug.
>> 
>> --
>> Do what you will,                       John Cowan
>>    this Life's a Fiction                cowan at ccil.org
>> And is made up of                       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>> <http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
>>    Contradiction.  --William Blake
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20090221/bde5fb6d/attachment.htm