Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU
kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se
Sat Feb 21 23:16:30 CET 2009
I agree as well. Note that that means *no change* compared to 4645bis draft
9 in the record for YU.
Den 2009-02-21 23.05, skrev "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>:
> I agree with John and Doug.
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 13:13, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
>> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>>> > As part of the production of a replacement Registry in draft-4645bis, it
>>> > has been proposed to remove the Preferred-Value from "YU" -- as an LTRU
>>> > change -- and optionally replace it with a Comments field such as
>>> > "Comments: see BA, HR, ME, MK, RS, or SI".
>> IMHO we should have LTRU go ahead and do this. When a new Registry is
>> installed, it should be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. There is
>> no point in deferring this one change -- after all, in principle almost
>> *all* the new registry changes allowed by 4646bis could be deferred to
>> this list, but what's the point?
>> Furthermore, despite the technical distinction between LTRU and
>> ietf-languages, the person involved is the same, our very own Official
>> Do what you will, John Cowan
>> this Life's a Fiction cowan at ccil.org
>> And is made up of http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>> Contradiction. --William Blake
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages