Requests that have been on hold

CE Whitehead cewcathar at
Sun Aug 9 23:39:22 CEST 2009

Doug, thanks for remembering these!
Also, why is the added date for [vmf] (and other new subtags) appear as:Added: 2029-09-09
???Should not it be: Added: 2009-09-09Or??(I'm sorry I am new at this; it does not look right but I am sure it is me.) I suppose I should create three separate threads for the rest of this. Best, C. E. Whiteheadcewcathar at

Doug Ewell doug at 
Sun Aug 9 07:26:13 CEST 2009 
> Now that we have access to the full RFC 4646bis Registry, with its ISO > 639-3-based subtags, it's probably a good time to go back and review the > various proposals that have been discussed, but put on hold until the > new Registry took effect.

> This would include at least the following proposals:
> . . . 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list