<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Doug, thanks for remembering these!</FONT><BR><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Also, why is the added date for [vmf] (and other new subtags) appear as:</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Added: 2029-09-09
???</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Should not it be:</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma></FONT> </PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Added: 2009-09-09</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Or??</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>(I'm sorry I am new at this; it does not look right but I am sure it is me.)</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma></FONT> </PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>I suppose I should create three separate threads for the rest of this.</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma></FONT> </PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>Best,</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma></FONT> </PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma>C. E. Whitehead</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT color=#000000 face=Tahoma><A href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</A></FONT></PRE>
<BR>Doug Ewell <A title="Requests that have been on hold" href="mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no?Subject=Requests that have been on hold&In-Reply-To=">doug at ewellic.org </A><BR>Sun Aug 9 07:26:13 CEST 2009 <BR><PRE>> Now that we have access to the full RFC 4646bis Registry, with its ISO </PRE><PRE>> 639-3-based subtags, it's probably a good time to go back and review the </PRE><PRE>> various proposals that have been discussed, but put on hold until the </PRE><PRE>> new Registry took effect.
> This would include at least the following proposals:
</PRE><PRE>> . . . </PRE></body>
</html>