Generic subtags (was: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (R4): pinyin)
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Wed Sep 24 15:04:04 CEST 2008
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> A generic variant subtag is one that denotes some general kind of
> variation potentially applicable to any language (or, at least, a wide
> variety of languages) -- things like "western" or "ancient". We have
> two generic subtags registered to date, "fonipa" and "fonupa"; these
> were approved as an exception to our conventional preference against
> generic subtags because they do refer to some very specific forms of
> linguistic expression; they just happen to be generic because those
> are systems of writing that can be used for a wide variety of
> languages.
But once again, I claim that this latter point needs to be well
understood. We have a conventional preference against generic subtags,
not because they are a bad idea per se, but because they are a bad idea
when the variation doesn't apply consistently across languages. For
cases like phonetic alphabets that do apply consistently across
languages, we can and should register generic subtags, and not be put
off by the belief that they are to be avoided in all cases.
Peter is spot on with the rest of his post: we need to be very careful
about overloading the word "generic" in discussing the difference
between subtags that reference a year and those that do not. As with
other words like "redundant" and "deprecated," this word has a specific
meaning in our context.
--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list