Michael Everson everson at
Wed Sep 24 22:02:15 CEST 2008

On 24 Sep 2008, at 20:26, David Starner wrote:

> But whether or not that distinction is important may not be something
> the tagger knows; a librarian tagging recordings is probably better
> off tagging km-US, es-US and pqm-US for recordings of those language
> as spoken by Americans in the US then fussing over the fine details of
> dialectal variation in those languages.

Seems to me the librarian would be better off tagging km, es, and pqm  
if she doesn't know better.

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list