mahaniok at gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 16:50:31 CEST 2008
both those are Cyrillic, since both of them are "standard" way of
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> We have three outstanding registration requests, one for the "Academy"
>> romanization of Belarusian (as distinct from Taraskievica), one for
>> Pinyin (however that is defined), and one for Wade-Giles.
> Regarding Belarusian, for "romanization" please read "Latin-script
> orthography." I apologize for the error but trust everyone knew what I
> I got a private response:
>> IIUC both Taraskievica and "Academy" are Cyrillic orthographies for
>> Belarusian, not Latin orthographies, thus not romanisations.
> Actually these are Latin orthographies; the "standard" way of writing
> Belarusian is in Cyrillic.
> Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages