Suppress-Script for Korean?

[Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com]

Randy,

I realize you're the expert here, but based on what I read, pure Hiragana 
and Katakana may have been more popular in the past or for informal use. I 
believe the pure forms were also used by women in the past.

So, question: When we use Suppress-Script, do we consider historical forms 
of the language, or is this designation only considered in terms of 
current use? Raising this issue with Hiragana made me realize that I don't 
know the answer to this question.

Randy writes:

>For a document longer than a few words to be purely "Hira" would be 
*very*
>artifical, and consequently I'd expect it to be marked as such, just as
>an extended document solely in Kanji or Katakana would also be quite 
artifical. 

Regards,

Karen Broome
Sony Pictures Entertainment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20070724/ba3395ac/attachment.html