Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)
randy_presuhn at mindspring.com
Sat Dec 8 01:29:47 CET 2007
> From: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>
> To: <ietf-languages at iana.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)
> So far, I consider this a vanity orthography.
> Please supply four more books or articles written
> in the orthography, and not from samizdat
Though it would indeed be nice to have that much substantiation
of the orthography's use, I don't see how RFC 4646 sets any particular
requirement here. Is this something where the ltru WG will need to add
guidance in the update to the BCP?
> > 6. Any other relevant information:
> >In 2004 researchers of the university of
> >Montreal (
> This article is *in* standard French.
How does this constitute an objection? There is no requirement
that descriptions of languages registered be written in that language.
> Please list 50 distinct items, be they books, websites, or software.
Where does this requirement come from? Have similar demands
been made of other registration requests?
More information about the Ietf-languages