Encoding scripts in tags: evil or just unpleasant?

[Tex Texin]

Peter, thanks. That is what I believed, before and after I looked, but I felt
the need to look after I read Keld's message claiming sr represented cyrillic.

Peter_Constable at sil.org wrote:
> 
> Tex Texin wrote on 05/23/2003 03:00:09 PM:
> 
> > I looked at ISO 639 and I see nothing to indicate sr refers to a
> cyrillic
> > form
> 
> Items in ISO 639 do not, as defined by that standard, imply anything about
> script, except perhaps (given the lack of documentation, it can't be said
> with absolute certainty) in the case of Turkish pre/post 1928.
> 
> - Peter
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Constable
> 
> Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
> 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
> Tel: +1 972 708 7485
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex at XenCraft.com
Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
                         
XenCraft		            http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------