Additional thoughts on TRANSITIONAL ( Which level of label )

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:55:37AM +0330, Alireza Saleh wrote:
> I don't understand what the protocol is trying to solve. If this is the 

The idea behind what I suggested is just that a zone operator can say
what their policy is, and clients can learn that, in a generalized (or
generalizable) way.  I fully admit it's a giant and expensive means to
the end, but it's the only way I know of signalling between the end
points in this otherwise mostly-stateless interaction.

> a domain-name and not only TLDs or SLDs 
> that are directly under the control of zone operators.

Surely every single existing RNAME in the DNS is directly under the
control of some zone operator?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.