[R-C] BoF approved

Michael Welzl michawe at ifi.uio.no
Thu Jul 12 13:12:00 CEST 2012


Hi,

Thanks a lot for this message, as it clarified something for me!

Below:

On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:13 AM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:

> John Leslie <john at jlc.net> wrote:
>> RTP-congestion work is NOT limited to RTCWEB. Please recall our BoF
>> is called "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques".
>
> Is there consensus on this first critical point?
>
> 1. Some folks are using RTP and RTCWEB interchangeably.
> 2. Some folks are assuming the work is limited to new protocols only  
> (like maybe RTCWEB and CLUE), as evidenced by proposals to consider  
> SCTP.

I am the one who pushed that view (about SCTP). Indeed I assumed this  
limitation, and assume is the right word - in the sense of: any other  
context just didn't even occur to me!


> 3. Some folks are assuming all RTP applications are in scope.

Because I very much agree with this, I herewith withdraw my SCTP  
proposal  :-)


> 4. Some folks are assuming interoperability with existing RTP  
> applications are also in scope.

I agree that this would be good to have, if it is possible.

Cheers,
Michael



More information about the Rtp-congestion mailing list