[R-C] BoF approved

[Randell Jesup]

On 7/8/2012 11:13 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
> John Leslie <john at jlc.net> wrote:
>> RTP-congestion work is NOT limited to RTCWEB. Please recall our BoF
>> is called "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques".

Trying to avoid specifics to talk to the general issues:

> Is there consensus on this first critical point?
>
> 1. Some folks are using RTP and RTCWEB interchangeably.

They shouldn't.  We need solutions for both, but as a (largely) 
green-field rtcweb may be able to implement things sooner (or with more 
ubiquity) than general RTP applications.

> 2. Some folks are assuming the work is limited to new protocols only (like maybe RTCWEB and CLUE), as evidenced by proposals to consider SCTP.

I would not assume that, but it may be easier to deploy in those 
environments per above, or they may add constraints that help solutions 
for those areas.

> 3. Some folks are assuming all RTP applications are in scope.
> 4. Some folks are assuming interoperability with existing RTP applications are also in scope.

yes - but gaining benefits for existing apps without any change by them 
is unlikely except via network changes.  With changes, existing apps may 
be able to more fully take part.

> I disagree with 1+2.
> Does anyone disagree with 3+4?

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf at jesup.org