[R-C] Question about the problem with TFRC

Colin Perkins csp at csperkins.org
Tue Apr 17 12:07:48 CEST 2012


On 17 Apr 2012, at 08:16, Michael Welzl wrote:
> I noticed that TFRC is, well, unpopular here. I understand the reasons, in particular the group's desire to minimize buffering. So I'm not making a proposal here, just asking a question out of academic curiosity: is this just handwaving and assumptions, or have some people given it a try and found that it doesn't work well? Are there any documented results showing that?

I had a Masters student look at it a few years ago, who had some problems making TFRC usable in practice: http://csperkins.org/research/thesis-msc-saurin.pdf 

Also, the TFWC work http://tfwc.hackerslab.eu/ points to various problems with TFRC.

Colin



> I think someone posted earlier on that there were poor experiences with TFRC; I'm just interested in more details about that. Again, I'm not proposing anything here, just interested for my own research.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rtp-congestion mailing list
> Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion



-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/





More information about the Rtp-congestion mailing list