Anomaly in upcoming registry

[Doug Ewell]

Lang Gérard <gerard dot lang at insee dot fr> wrote:

> So that my text should be completed by the adjunction of a new point:
>
> "12-On 2009-03-03, ISO 639/RA-JAC changed the language names 
> concerning 42 alpha-3 collective language ISO 639-2 code elements,  so 
> that:
> -"ine/ine" that was an initial code element of ISO 639-2 (1998) 
> changed its collective language name from "Indo-European (Others)/ 
> indo-europennes, autres langues" to "Indo-European, languages/ 
> indo-europennes, langues";
> -"sla/sla" that was an initial code element of ISO 639-2 (1998) 
> changed its collective language name from "Slavic (Other)/ slaves, 
> autres langues" to "Slavic languages/ slaves, langues".

But I don't see what this has to do with whether "sh" and/or "hbs" 
should be withdrawn from any part of ISO 639, or deprecated in the 
Registry.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ