browser behavioral differences for IDNA
Mark Davis ☕
mark at macchiato.com
Wed Oct 21 21:51:48 CEST 2009
FYI, UTS 46 points to differences among browsers regarding separator
(period) behavior. See
Markus and I have further investigated some browser behavior, and have also
found differences regarding normalization behavior for IDNA. See:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:24, <announcements at unicode.org> wrote:
> The draft UTS#46 Unicode IDNA Compatible Preprocessing has been updated.
> There are a number of new review notes pointing out issues and asking for
> feedback. There are also new tables: one comparing behavior of compatibility
> and escaped versions of FULL STOP in delimiting labels between different
> browsers, and one comparing the allowed and disallowed repertoires when
> processing IDNs according to the IDNA2003, IDNA2008, and UTS #46
> specifications. There are also many improvements and clarifications of the
> See: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/
> Review period closes October 26, 2009.
> If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them by
> submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:
> If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please
> use the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware
> that discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not automatically
> recorded as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above
> to generate comments for UTC consideration.
> All of the Unicode Consortium lists are strictly opt-in lists for members
> or interested users of our standards. We make every effort to remove
> users who do not wish to receive e-mail from us. To see why you are getting
> this mail and how to remove yourself from our lists if you want, please
> see http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html#announcements
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Idna-update