Contextual rule for MODIFIER LETTER PRIME?

[Michael Everson]

On 16 Jul 2009, at 08:58, Patrik Fältström wrote:

> On 16 jul 2009, at 02.29, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>
>> U+02B9 should simply be PVALID -- which will happen
>> automatically if it is removed from the exception list in 2.6.
>> And then Appendix A.6 should simply be removed instead of
>> trying to define a complex rule that would make any sense
>> for it as CONTEXTO.
>
> This would make mine (and many others) life much easier.
>
> Can we get consensus on this?

I concur.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/