Contextual rule for MODIFIER LETTER PRIME?

[Patrik Fältström]

On 16 jul 2009, at 02.29, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> U+02B9 should simply be PVALID -- which will happen
> automatically if it is removed from the exception list in 2.6.
> And then Appendix A.6 should simply be removed instead of
> trying to define a complex rule that would make any sense
> for it as CONTEXTO.

This would make mine (and many others) life much easier.

Can we get consensus on this?

    paf

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090716/8f313126/attachment.pgp