Contextual rule for MODIFIER LETTER PRIME?

Patrik Fältström patrik at frobbit.se
Mon Jul 20 20:02:45 CEST 2009


On 16 jul 2009, at 10.24, Michael Everson wrote:

> On 16 Jul 2009, at 08:58, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
>> On 16 jul 2009, at 02.29, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>>
>>> U+02B9 should simply be PVALID -- which will happen
>>> automatically if it is removed from the exception list in 2.6.
>>> And then Appendix A.6 should simply be removed instead of
>>> trying to define a complex rule that would make any sense
>>> for it as CONTEXTO.
>>
>> This would make mine (and many others) life much easier.
>>
>> Can we get consensus on this?
>
> I concur.

02B9 is now removed from the exception list.

    paf



More information about the Idna-update mailing list