Last Call: 'IETF Problem Statement' to Informational RFC

[Robert Snively]

I share Keith's concern, both about the response to
his comments, and to the response about my comments
from about the same time.

Bob Snively
+1-408-333-8135

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:16 AM
> To: avri at acm.org
> Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no; Keith Moore; iesg at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'IETF Problem Statement' to Informational RFC
> 
> 
> > While we did call rough consensus despite your comments, 
> and those of  
> > Todd Glassey and Alex Conta,  we did not ignore your 
> comments and they  
> > were included in the report on the rough consensus:
> >
> > http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/problem-statement/2003- 
> > December/003245.html
> 
> that's a stretch.  I certainly didn't recognize a response to 
> any of my  
> comments in this "report".
> 
> > to which you commented, albeit not in agreement,:
> >
> > http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/problem-statement/2003- 
> > December/003247.html
> 
> yes, I was commenting on your complete failure to evaluate my 
> comments.
> 
> 
>