IESG proposed statement on the IETF mission

Scott W Brim swb at employees.org
Wed Oct 29 11:08:35 CET 2003


On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 04:13:20PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
> The IETF covers a wide range of technical areas and it is impossible
> to set fully objective boundaries that allow an algorithmic answer to
> the question whether a particular item is within the IETF's technical
> scope. However, it can be stated that IETF work items are always
> concerned with either the Internet Protocol layer itself (Layer 3 in
> the ISO/OSI Reference Model), with its management and routing, with
> transport protocols (Layer 4) that may seriously impact the correct
> functioning of the IP layer, or with direct uses of the transport
> layer that provide generic services. Security mechanisms for all of
> the above are also in scope.
> 
> Transmission technologies below Layer 3, and upper layer protocols
> that are not generic in nature, are generally out of scope. Also,
> tightly integrated suites of generic upper layer protocols (for
> example, the Web Services protocols) may be more appropriately
> specified by a dedicated standards body.

Corollary: Anything that has to run everywhere IP runs.  This pulls in
protocols which need to establish state at every IP hop, not just
waypoints (e.g. application proxies).  The one that's on my mind is
MPLS.


More information about the Problem-statement mailing list