OPEN ISSUE: Quality Process WG Charter
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Thu May 29 16:23:16 CEST 2003
--On torsdag, mai 29, 2003 09:04:54 -0400 Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
wrote:
>> So, do we have consensus to start the near-term WG to
>> improve the WG quality processes and IETF review
>> processes?
>
> I fear that if we do this, the WG will spend too much time on review
> processes and not enough time on WG operation. But I'm not sure what to
> do about it: both subjects need attention, and if we created two separate
> WGs then the one working on extra-WG review might attract a lot more
> interest than the one working on WG operation.
I think this WG would/should be focused on the WG process, and review as
one tool to improve that process.
This should not be confused with the issues surrounding end-of-line IESG
review (although one hopes that improving one would make the other far less
problematic).
My understanding....
Harald
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list